How bluesign® Leads Sustainable Fashion

bluesign® Driving Strategic Transformation Toward a Safer and More Sustainable Fashion Industry

bluesign® Welcomes LIM Group

bluesign® Welcomes Designer Denim Maker, LIM Group

SAITEX MILL in Vietnam Joins bluesign®

SAITEX MILL in Vietnam Joins as bluesign® System Partner

EU Strengthens Chemical Safety in Textiles

EU Strengthens Chemical Safety in Textiles

The European Commission has recently published the highly anticipated restriction on the use of undecafluorohexanoic acid (PFHxA), its salts, and related substances (Commission Regulation (EU) 2024/2462). This new restriction comes by way of adding entry 79 to Annex XVII to the REACH regulation. The decision was made due to PFHxA’s environmental persistence, its high mobility in aquatic environment, and its potential adverse effects on both human health and the environment.

PFHxA is a subgroup of PFAS (Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances). PFHxA and its related compounds are widely utilized in several industries, notably in the production of textiles, paper, cardboard, and firefighting foams. In particular, these substances are used in the manufacture of water- and stain-resistant textiles, often found in outdoor clothing like rain jackets, and various accessories, such as handbags and footwear. The widespread and dispersive use of PFHxA in these products is of significant concern as it contributes to increasing environmental contamination and human exposure over time.

In light of this, the European Commission has deemed it necessary to implement a Union-wide restriction on the sale and use of PFHxA, its salts, and related substances in a range of consumer products. These include not only textiles like clothing, leather, and furs but also household items such as carpets, rugs, curtains, blinds, upholstery and food contact materials like paper and cardboard. The restriction extends to items used in public spaces and offices, particularly those frequently visited by the general public. Additionally, certain firefighting foams and cosmetic products containing PFHxA-related substances will be affected by the new regulation.

Transition Period

PFHxA, its salts and related substances shall not be placed on the market in the following products from the dates indicated below:

Restrictions on the use of firefighting foams take effect on 10 April 2026, with an extended deadline of 10 October 2029 for firefighting foams used in civil aviation.

Several uses are exempted from the stipulated restrictions, namely the following:

bluesign’s Commitment to PFAS Phase-Out

SanMar Joins bluesign®

SanMar Joins bluesign®, Reinforcing Its Leadership in Sustainability

Storm Creek Joins as bluesign® System Partner

Storm Creek Joins as bluesign® System Partner – First US Promotional Products Brand

DONDUP Partners with bluesign in Sustainable Denim

DONDUP Partners with bluesign® to Set a New Standard in Sustainable Denim

ERCA Becomes First bluesign® System Partner in Brazil

bluesign Standards: Reducing Bisphenol Risks in Sustainable Textile Production

Bisphenols are a group of chemicals mostly used in the industrial manufacturing of polymers such as polycarbonate plastics and epoxy resins. These materials are used across a range of consumer products, making them common in many everyday products. The most widely used and known is bisphenol A (BPA), although following the restrictions on the BPA leads to the increasing volumes of bisphenol S and bisphenol F that may be equally harmful.

What is the concern about bisphenols?

Health impact:
Bisphenol A (BPA) is well known as an endocrine disruptor – can mimic human estrogen and therefore may affect fertility and disrupt the development of unborn child. In addition, BPA is also linked to several adverse health outcomes including cardiovascular diseases, hormone related cancer risk, obesity, and metabolic diseases.

Environmental impact:
Bisphenols leaching into water supplies and soil may lead to long-term ecological damage. Aquatic life, in particular, is at risk as bisphenols can disrupt the hormonal balance of fish and other organisms.

Moreover, Bisphenol A is classified in the EU as a substance that:

• causes toxic effects on our ability to reproduce
• causes serious eye damage
• may cause respiratory irritation

• may cause skin allergies
• very toxic to aquatic life
• very toxic to aquatic life with long lasting effect

Did you know?

Bisphenol A has been detected in the urine of 92% of adult research participants covering 11 European countries in the concentration exceeding safe level.

Are there any legal restrictions on bisphenols?

Bisphenols, especially BPA, are subject to various legal restrictions and regulations worldwide due to their potential health risks. Here’s an overview of some key regulations and legal lists where bisphenols are restricted:

European Union

• The candidate list of substances of very high concern contains three bisphenols
• EU restriction proposal for bisphenols of similar concern (BOSC) with proposed limit 10 ppm for sum

• Currently covered BP A,B,S,F,AF

• REACH BPA restriction

• Its use in the thermal paper has been restricted since January 2020
• BPA has been banned in infant feeding bottles since 2011 and in plastic bottles and packaging containing food for babies and children since 2018

United States

• The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) restricts the use of BPA in baby bottles, sippy cups, and the packaging of infant formula
• Since 2015 BPA is listed in the California Proposition 65 as substance causing reproductive toxicity
• California prohibits children´s feeding/ sucking/ teething products containing bisphenols
• Listed on TSCA Inventory by Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) – regulating and monitoring chemicals in control to human health and environment

Canada

• BPA is identified as toxic substance under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999
• Regulations under the Canada Consumer Product Safety Act prohibit the manufacture, advertisement, sale or import of baby bottles containing BPA
• BPA is listed on Canadian Cosmetic Ingredient Hotlist as a prohibited substance for use in Cosmetics

China

• In 2011 the Ministry of Health announced the prohibition of manufacturing, import and sale of infant feeding bottles containing BPA

Where can be bisphenols be found in the textile industry?

Although the primary route of exposure to bisphenols is through diet, as these chemicals can leach from food packaging, it is important to be cautious about other potential contact pathways. Bisphenols can also enter the body through the skin by contact with items like textiles that may contain traces of these chemicals. Therefore, it is crucial to pay attention to the materials we come into contact within our daily lives to minimize overall bisphenol exposure.

Dye-fixing Agent

Bisphenols may be used in dye-fixing agents to provide long-lasting colors.

Adhesives and Binders

Bisphenols are used in adhesives and binders helping to assemble multi-layered products.

Textile Coatings

Bisphenols make coatings that provide durability and resistance, used in items like raincoats, upholstery, and outdoor gear.

Polymers Production

BPA may be used to produce a number of polymers including polyester, the most common synthetic fiber used in clothing and home textiles.

Moving forward with bluesign!

Given the significant health and environmental risks associated with bisphenols, reducing, or eliminating their use is crucial. Protecting human health, especially vulnerable populations such as pregnant women and children, is a primary concern.

Bisphenols A, AF, B, F, and S, which are all currently listed by BOSC, are regulated under the bluesign® BSSL and BSBL. bluesign enforces a usage ban on BPA with one of the most stringent limits on the market, verifying compliance with most regulatory restrictions.

BPA from Chemicals and Consumer Safety

The use of bluesign® APPROVED chemical products guarantees BPA input at a very low level, based on the strict BSBL limit. Additionally, using bluesign® APPROVED materials and adhering to the Restricted Substances List (RSL) for sourcing ensures compliance with the highest market standards. Together with effective Input Stream Management (ISM) is the best strategy to ensure safety.

Textile recycling with bluesign

Textile recycling is a significant aspect of sustainability, but it often involves the unknown chemical mixtures including bisphenols.

This topic underlines the importance of the Input Stream Management. In general, reliable sources in combination with ISM and testing provide remarkable reduction of the potential exposure.

For bluesign® SYSTEM PARTNERS instruction regarding the use of recycled material is available in our guidance documents.

Alternatives? Use bluesign® FINDER

The push towards eliminating bisphenols in the textile industry involves finding safer alternatives that do not compromise the quality and functionality of the products. Research and development are focusing on biodegradable and non-toxic compounds that can replace bisphenols in various textile applications.

bluesign® FINDER offers the world’s most comprehensive positive list for APPROVED chemical products, all complying with strict bisphenol limits. It provides access to over 25,000 chemical products that support sustainable chemistry and clean production achieving the RSL compliance. Moreover, bluesign® FINDER offers nearly 200 bisphenol- free alternatives for aftertreatment agents.

With bluesign® certified textiles, consumers can confidently choose products ensuring safety and sustainability in every thread.

Press Release: From Lab to Label

The bluesign® Difference

The bluesign® Difference

New Announcements

New Announcements with Soko Chimica, Pure Denim, & DONDUP

Soko Chimica lab
Phaseout Program

bluesign CMR Solvent Phaseout Program

EU Parliament Banning Greenwashing

EU parliament adopts law on banning greenwashing

Eco-modulation in France
Get a bonus for your textile products certified as bluesign® PRODUCT

https://extranet.refashion.fr/en/

https://refashion.fr/pro/en/2021-eco-fees-scale

https://refashion.fr/pro/sites/default/files/fichiers/BAREME_ECO_MODULATIONS_2023_REFASHION_EN_EXE.pdf


Toxic zinc pyrithione in textile products

Transforming Waste into Fashion

Transforming Waste into Fashion with SYSTEM PARTNER ERCA Group

BLUESIGN® academy white paper: new york fashion act

The Fashion Act is intended to lead the way on sustainable apparel production, in much the same way that the State of California was in the vanguard of vehicle emissions legislation in the US some years

the european commission green

The european commission green claims directive

This bluesign® ACADEMY White Paper provides an overview of the Directive. If you would like to speak to us about forthcoming regulatory change please contact us at bluesign@academy.com

OVERVIEW

  • The European Green Deal tackles false environmental claims by ensuring that buyers receive reliable, comparable, and verifiable information to make more sustainable decisions and to reduce ‘green washing’.
  • European Commission (EC) wants environmental claims based on environmental impacts along products’ life cycles to be substantiated.
  • EC will regulate use of environmental claims by establishing solid and harmonized calculation methods covering the full value chain.

CLAIMS

MISLEADING CLAIMS: THE SCALE OF THE PROBLEM

  • In spite of consumers’ willingness to contribute to a greener and more circular economy this is hampered by a lack of trust in the credibility of environmental claims and the proliferation of misleading commercial practices related to the environmental sustainability of products.
  • Greenwashing and lack of transparency and credibility of environmental labels, occur at various stages of the consumption journey.
  • The European Commission’s 2020 study found that of environmental claims 53.3% provide vague, misleading, or unfounded information about products’ environmental characteristics across the EU and across a wide range of product categories.
  • 40% of environmental claims were unsubstantiated by verifiable evidence.
  • Of 344 sustainability claims assessed by EU Member State Consumer Protection authorities, in 57.5% instances the claim’s accuracy could not be judged.
  • In 50% of cases Member State Authorities had difficulties identifying whether claims covered the whole product or only one of its components
  • In 36% of cases, whether it referred to the company or only certain products, and:
  • In 75% of cases which stage of the products lifecycle it covered (75%).
  • Most stakeholders consulted agreed that greenwashing is a problem, with the noticeable exception of industry representatives

FRAMEWORK FOR FUTURE CLAIMS

The proposal requires that in future explicit environmental claims shall be based on an assessment that at minimum is defined by criteria that are not misleading, and that the claim:

  • relies on recognized scientific evidence and state of the art technical knowledge;
  • demonstrates the significance of impacts, aspects, and performance from a life-cycle perspective;
  • accounts for all significant aspects and impacts to assess the performance
  • demonstrates whether the claim is accurate for the whole product or only for parts of it (for the whole life cycle or only for certain stages, for all the trader’s activities or only a part of them);
  • demonstrates that the claim is not equivalent to requirements imposed by law;

provides information on whether the product performs environmentally significantly better than what is common practice;

  •  identifies whether a positive achievement leads to significant worsening of another impact;
  • requires greenhouse gas offsets to be reported in a transparent manner;
  •  includes accurate primary or secondary information.

LABELLING

ENVIRONMENTAL LABELLING: THE ISSUES

 (Environmental labels: i.e., those covering predominantly environmental aspects of a product or trader)

An assessment of 232 active ecolabels in the EU also examined their verification and certification aspects and concluded that almost half of the labels’ verification was either weak or not carried out.

Over a quarter (27%) of participants said “the proliferation and/or lack of transparency/ understanding/reliability of sustainability logos/labels on products and services” was an obstacle to empowering consumers.

34% of businesses identified the “the proliferation and/or lack of transparency / understanding / reliability of sustainability logos / labels” as an obstacle.

Companies that make the effort to adhere to or develop reliable environmental labelling schemes are disadvantaged compared to companies that use unreliable environmental labels as consumers often cannot tell the difference.

Companies that offer truly sustainable products are disadvantaged compared to those that do not.

FRAMEWORK FOR FUTURE LABELLING

The mechanism that will be used to ensure that in future, environmental labelling is neither vague, misleading, nor unfounded, will be through an amendment to the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive. It will:

  • List product characteristics about which a trader should not deceive a consumer is to include ‘environmental or social impact, ‘durability’ and ‘reparability’.
  • The list of actions which are to be considered misleading if they cause or are likely to cause the average consumers to take a transactional decision that they would not have otherwise taken, ‘making an environmental claim related to future environmental performance without clear, objective, and verifiable commitments and targets and an independent monitoring system.
  • The list of unfair commercial practices will expand to include:
  • Displaying a sustainability label which is not based on a certification scheme or not established by public authorities.
  • Making a generic environmental claim for which the trader is not able to demonstrate recognized excellent environmental performance relevant to the claim.
  • Making an environmental claim about the entire product when it concerns only a certain aspect of the product.
  • Presenting requirements imposed by law on all products in the relevant product category on the Union market as a distinctive feature of the trader’s offer.
  • The proposal is for a stand-alone legal instrument that …sets a framework for the substantiation of voluntary environmental claims.
  • Member States shall provide that penalties and measures for infringements of this Directive shall include:-
  • fines which effectively deprive those responsible of the economic benefits derived from their infringements, and increasing the level of such fines for repeated infringements;
  • confiscation of revenues gained by the trader from a transaction with the relevant products concerned;
  • temporary exclusion for a maximum period of 12 months from public procurement processes and from access to public funding, including tendering procedures, grants, and concessions.
  • The maximum amount of such fines being at least at 4 % of the trader’s annual turnover in the Member State or Member States concerned.

VERIFICATION

ENSURING IMPARTIAL VERIFICATION OF FUTURE CLAIMS

An entity verifying environmental claims:

  • Shall be a third-party conformity assessment body formally accredited by a nationally recognized certifying entity.
  • Accreditation given to a claim shall be based upon an evaluation in compliance with the requirements in below:
  • the verifier shall be independent of the product bearing, or the trader associated to, the environmental claim;
  • the verifier, its top-level management, and the personnel responsible for carrying out the verification tasks shall not engage in any activity that may conflict with their independence of judgement or integrity in relation to the verification activities;
  • the verifier and its personnel shall carry out the verification activities with the highest degree of professional integrity and the requisite technical competence and shall be free from all pressures and inducements, particularly financial, which might influence their judgement or the results of their verification activities,
  •  the verifier shall have the expertise, equipment and infrastructure required to perform the verification activities in relation to which it has been accredited; 
  • the verifier shall have a sufficient number of suitably qualified and experienced personnel responsible for carrying out the verification tasks;
  • the personnel of a verifier shall observe professional secrecy with regard to all information obtained in carrying out the verification tasks;
  • where a verifier subcontracts specific tasks connected with verification or has recourse to a subsidiary, it shall take full responsibility for the tasks performed by subcontractors or subsidiaries and shall assess and monitor the qualifications of the subcontractor or the subsidiary and the work carried out by them. 

TIMING

As a first step, the Directive is to be put before the European Parliament. No date has been set for this.

Once signed, the Directive:

  • is to be published in the Official Journal of the European Union and will come into force on the 20th day following publication.
  • if signed in early 2024, it is then to be transposed into the law of the Member States during and start-up period over a two-year period from 2024 onwards.
  • is to be in full scale operation across the EU is scheduled thereafter.

The Directive will be in force for an unlimited duration.

Bisphenol restriction proposal withdrawn

bluesign proactively monitors and restricts substances of concern to help its system partners to be prepared for upcoming regulations.

The European Chemicals Agency ECHA informed on August 30th that:

The German authorities have withdrawn their proposal to restrict bisphenols that have endocrine disrupting properties to the environment from the opinion-making process by ECHA’s scientific committees. They intend to re-submit an updated proposal to ECHA once they have considered the information submitted by stakeholders during the six-month consultation and reworked the scope of the restriction.”

The restriction proposal on bisphenols is a hot topic due to very low limits and a dynamic link to other regulations. Whenever a bisphenol substance is classified as endocrine disruptor for the environment in one of these regulations, the whole bisphenol restriction applies automatically to this substance.

bluesign informed its stakeholders during the Chemical Expert Group (CEG) in April and the bluesign® ACADEMY webinar in June 2023 about this topic and the high relevance for textile and leather industry.

bluesign proactively monitors and restricts substances of concern to help its system partners to be prepared for upcoming regulations. Therefore, the bisphenol restriction proposal has been considered in the 2023 revision process for the bluesign restricted substances lists BSSL and BSBL, but the very strict limits of the proposal have not been implemented.

The withdrawal of the restriction proposal has no effect on the existing limits for bisphenols at bluesign. The risk assessments of the single bisphenols are based on the current scientific information and remain unchanged. As announces at the CEG, chemical products containing >1000 mg/kg bisphenol S will be removed from the bluesign® FINDER on December 1st, 2023, based on the new harmonized classification.

The delay in the legislation process might increase the time until more stringent limits must be applied and offers more time to find good alternatives

Decarbonization Priorities

Decarbonization Priorities for Brands

Decarbonization Priorities
bluesign CEO Joins Board

Our CEO Daniel Rüfenacht Joins the Founders Board at Transformer’s Foundation

bluesign CEO Joins Board
EU Green Deal

EU Green Deal
The EU Is Implementing Its Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability Find Out How bluesign Can Help


  1. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32001L0095&from=EN ↩︎